ObGyn Intelligence
Evidence Matters
Prepare
Evidence LibraryBefore pregnancy and fertilityLater pregnancy risks
Evidence Library · Later pregnancy risks

What an IVF pregnancy carries, once twins are taken out

Most of the crude difference is multiples. The rest is real and mostly about the placenta.

Assisted reproduction babies as a group do worse than other babies. Most of that gap is twins. Here it is both ways, from the 2018 national surveillance report:

Outcome, 2018 surveillanceAll ART infantsART singletons onlyAll US infants
Born before 37 weeks26.1%14.9%10.0% (8.3% for singletons)
Low birth weight18.3%8.3%8.3% (6.6% for singletons)

Restricting to single babies cuts the preterm gap from about 16 percentage points to about 6.6, and the low birth weight gap from about 10 points to about 1.7.

An earlier topic in this part quotes a lower figure, 12.5% preterm. Two things separate them. The 12.5% is from the 2022 data, four years later, and practice kept changing across those years: single embryo transfer rose from 71.0% to 85.9% of transfers and twins fell from 18.1% to 8.4% of ART infants, the tail of a longer shift that began at 30.8% and 38.1% in 2013. The 12.5% also counts a narrower group, a single baby from a pregnancy that was single from the start, while the 14.9% counts all ART single babies.

What remains is not nothing. Pooling 50 cohort studies covering 161,370 IVF singleton pregnancies against 2.28 million spontaneous ones:

Outcome in IVF singletonsRelative risk (95% CI)
Placenta previa3.71 (2.67 to 5.16)
Antepartum haemorrhage2.11 (1.86 to 2.38)
Placental abruption1.83 (1.49 to 2.24)
Preterm birth1.71 (1.59 to 1.83)
Low birth weight1.61 (1.49 to 1.75)
Cesarean delivery1.58 (1.48 to 1.70)
Gestational diabetes1.31 (1.13 to 1.53)
Pregnancy-induced hypertension1.30 (1.04 to 1.62)
Two honest caveatsThese are cohort studies, not trials, and the variation between them is very high for several outcomes. Part of the excess is caused by the infertility itself rather than by the treatment, and no study design can fully separate the two.

Also, part of the early birth is a decision rather than spontaneous labor. Medically indicated preterm birth before 37 weeks ran at 4.73% after IVF against 1.81% after spontaneous conception, odds ratio 2.47 (95% CI 1.46 to 4.18).

The practical consequence is that an IVF pregnancy is watched more closely, and that placental problems are the specific thing being watched for. That is a reasonable use of extra surveillance, and it is worth knowing why the extra scans are happening.

Where this comes from:
62. Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Zhang Y, Jewett A, Boulet SL, Warner L, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance: United States, 2018. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022;71(4):1-19.
61. Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, Wang H, Gao S. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73-85.e1-6.
63. Cavoretto PI, Giorgione V, Sotiriadis A, Viganò P, Papaleo E, Galdini A, et al. IVF/ICSI treatment and the risk of iatrogenic preterm birth in singleton pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(10):1987-1996.

Covered in the essential classes

Continue

More from The pregnancy after

This page is educational. It supports the conversation with your own clinicians. It is not consent to any treatment, and it cannot assess you. If you are worried about a symptom now, see urgent warning signs.