US BirthData
Robson table interpreter

Robson Table Interpreter

Collect seven items for every delivery, build the standard Ten Group table, then read it in the order Robson intended: data quality first, group sizes second, rates only third.

Most units that adopt the Ten Group Classification System manage to build the table and then stop. The table is not the finding. It is the starting point for a structured audit, and reading it in the wrong order, rates before sizes, is the commonest error in the published literature.

This tool does three things. It tells you exactly what to collect. It builds the thirteen-row table from your own numbers, in the browser, with nothing sent anywhere. Then it walks you through the interpretation one question at a time and draws the charts that make each answer visible.

Publications used in this tool
1
Robson M, Murphy M, Byrne F. Quality assurance: The 10-Group Classification System (Robson classification), induction of labor, and cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(Suppl 1):S23–S27. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.026
Classification method
The source of every group definition, the six-column table construction, the 2a/2b subgroup split, and the rule that the induction denominator is groups 1+2 combined, never group 2 alone.
2
Robson MS. The 10-Group Classification System — a new way of thinking. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):1–4. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.026
Interpretive frameworkUS data caveat
The interpretive order applied throughout this tool: group size before group rate, and variance attributed to data quality first, epidemiological variables second, clinical practice only third. Also the published concern that prelabor cesarean counts in groups 2b and 4b are implausibly high in United States data.
3
Robson MS. Known knowns, unknown unknowns and everything in-between — the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS). BJOG. 2021;128(9):1454–1455. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16679
Data quality first
Group sizes and subgroup sizes are remarkably consistent across organisations, so a unique size pattern points to the denominator or to collection error before it points to practice.
4
Robson M. The Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) — a common starting point for more detailed analysis. BJOG. 2015;122(5):701. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13267
Standard table first
Why the plain ten-group table is presented before any expanded table: complicating the system at the outset with subgroups discourages adoption.
5
Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2001;12(1):23–39.
Original description
The foundational paper: the principles any classification must satisfy, and the original description of the ten groups. Not PubMed-indexed; no DOI located.
6
National Center for Health Statistics. Natality public use files, 2024. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Comparison data
Source of the optional United States 2024 comparison column: 1,131,901 cesareans in 3,483,099 hospital deliveries, overall rate 32.5 per cent. Classified by Grünebaum and Robson.

Nothing you type leaves this page

All classification and arithmetic runs in your browser. There is no server, no upload and no analytics. You can save this page and run it with no internet connection.

What to collect, for every delivery

Six items place each woman in one group before she delivers. The seventh is the outcome.

1

Parity

Nulliparous or multiparous. Count previous live births and stillbirths, not pregnancies. A woman with eight or more previous births is still multiparous, so do not let a capped field drop her out of the classification.

2

Previous cesarean

Yes or no. This single item decides group 5 for every term single cephalic pregnancy, so its accuracy governs the largest contributor to your overall rate.

3

Number of fetuses

Single or multiple. The unit of the classification is the woman, not the baby. A twin pregnancy is one record. Counting infants doubles group 8 and dilutes every other group.

4

Presentation

Cephalic, breech, or abnormal lie. Transverse and oblique lie go to group 9.

5

Gestational age

Completed weeks, split at 37. Use the obstetric or clinical estimate, not the last menstrual period.

6

Labor onset

Spontaneous, induced, or cesarean before labor. Defined by intention to treat, that is by what was planned before the childbirth process began. Never reclassify by what happened afterwards.

7

Outcome: cesarean delivery

Yes or no. This is the only item that is not known in advance. A multiple pregnancy counts as a cesarean if any baby was delivered abdominally.

The first six items place each woman in one group before delivery; the last is the outcome. Source: Robson M, Murphy M, Byrne F. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(Suppl 1):S23–S27.

How the groups are assigned

Apply these rules in strict order and stop at the first match. Order matters: a preterm breech twin must land in group 8, not group 6 or 10.

OrderIfThen group
1More than one fetus, any presentation, any gestation, including a previous cesarean8
2Singleton, abnormal lie (transverse or oblique), any gestation9
3Singleton breech, nulliparous6
4Singleton breech, multiparous, including a previous cesarean7
5Singleton cephalic, 36 weeks or less, including a previous cesarean10
6Singleton cephalic, 37 weeks or more, previous cesarean5
7Singleton cephalic, term, no previous cesarean, nulliparous1 / 2a / 2b by labor onset
8Singleton cephalic, term, no previous cesarean, multiparous3 / 4a / 4b by labor onset
–Any delivery with one of the six items missing or not statedUnclassified
Subgroups follow Robson: spontaneous labor to 1 and 3, induced labor to 2a and 4a, cesarean before labor to 2b and 4b. Unclassified is a data-quality indicator, not a clinical group, and is reported as a headline number rather than a footnote.

Four mistakes that are easy to make

Counting babies instead of women

The denominator of the classification is the woman. One twin pregnancy is one record. If your extract has one row per infant, collapse multiples to one row before classifying.

Using the wrong induction denominator

The induction rate for nulliparous women is group 2a over groups 1 and 2 combined. Dividing by group 2 alone gives a number near 86 per cent and means nothing. Same for 4a over groups 3 and 4.

Reclassifying after the event

Groups are prospective. A woman booked for induction who arrives in spontaneous labor belongs where her actual onset puts her, but a woman induced who then needed a cesarean stays in 2a. Record onset, not outcome.

Dropping records with a missing item

Do not exclude them. Carry them as unclassified. The unclassified percentage is the honest measure of your data quality, and hiding it conceals the one thing you should read first.

Enter your data

Four ways in. Everything is computed in your browser; nothing is transmitted.

Two numbers per row: cesareans in the group, and all women who delivered in that group. The percentages are derived, so do not type them.

GroupDescription CesareansWomen Derived

Paste two or three columns straight out of your spreadsheet: group label, cesareans, women. Tabs, commas or spaces all work. Rows in any order. Labels may read 1, 2a, Group 2a, G2a or unclassified. A combined 87/962 cell works too.

An .xlsx, .csv or .tsv file, read in your browser with no library and no network. The tool works out for itself whether the sheet holds a finished Robson table or one row per delivery, and says which it found before using anything. If the sheet carries a total row, the group rows are checked against it.

If the sheet holds one row per delivery

Header matching is case-insensitive and tolerant of underscores and spaces. Any row with a missing item becomes unclassified rather than being dropped.

ItemAccepted headerAccepted values
Parityparity, para, nulliparous, nullip, birth_order, previous_births0 or 1+ · nulliparous / multiparous · yes / no for a nulliparous column
Previous cesareanprevious_cesarean, prior_cesarean, prev_cs, previous_cs, prior_cdyes / no · 1 / 0 · true / false
Pluralityplurality, fetuses, number_of_fetuses, multiple, singleton, dplural1, 2, 3+ · single / multiple · singleton / twin / triplet
Presentationpresentation, presentation_code, lie, fetal_presentationcephalic / vertex · breech · transverse / oblique / abnormal / other
Gestational agegestational_age, ga, ga_weeks, weeks, completed_weeks, oegestCompleted weeks as a number, or term / preterm
Labor onsetlabor_onset, onset, induction, induced, prelabor_cesarean, trial_of_laborspontaneous · induced · prelabor cesarean / no labor
Cesareancesarean, caesarean, cs, cd, mode_of_delivery, delivery_method, routeyes / no · 1 / 0 · cesarean / vaginal · CS / SVD

A screenshot of a finished Robson table, a phone photograph of a printed one, or a page of a PDF. The image is read in your browser and never uploaded.

Nothing read from an image is used until you confirm it

Character recognition misreads digits: an 8 for a 3, a 5 for an 6, a lost thousands separator. A wrong denominator would corrupt every rate, contribution and flag downstream without looking wrong. So every figure arrives marked unconfirmed, sits beside the image for checking, and is cross-checked against the total printed on the image itself before it can be used.

The image

Read the numbers

A PDF page with a real text layer is read exactly, with no guessing. An image has to go through character recognition, which needs a one-off download of about 3 MB.

Load the United States 2024 hospital birth data so you can see the whole tool working before you enter anything of your own. This is the same dataset the optional comparison column uses.

3.48M
hospital deliveries
3,483,099
32.5%
overall cesarean rate
1,131,901 cesareans
0.5%
could not be classified
18,113 deliveries
Source: CDC NCHS natality public use file 2024, hospital births, classified by Grünebaum and Robson. Every count reconciles: the thirteen group denominators sum to 3,483,099 and the thirteen numerators to 1,131,901.

Your Ten Group table

Six columns, in Robson's order.

Presentation slide

A 1600 × 900 slide in the layout used for the National Maternity Hospital tables: title band, the standard ten-group table, and the counts, size, rate and contribution columns. Drops straight into PowerPoint or Keynote at 16:9.

Off by default. Robson's own guidance is to present the plain ten-group table first, because complicating it at the outset with subgroups discourages adoption.

What each column is

1

Cesareans / women

Raw counts. The group denominators must sum to your total. If they do not, stop and fix the extract before reading anything else.

2

Size of group

Women in the group divided by all women. Who delivers, before any cesarean rate enters the picture. This is the column to read first.

3

Cesarean rate in group

Cesareans in the group divided by women in that group. Meaningless until you have read the size column.

4

Contribution

Cesareans in the group divided by all women. The absolute contribution, not the relative one, so the thirteen contributions sum exactly to your overall rate.

5

Unclassified

A data-quality indicator, not a clinical group. Read it before any rate in the table.

Column construction from Robson M, Murphy M, Byrne F. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(Suppl 1):S23–S27. Reading order from Robson MS. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):1–4.

Interpretation, in order

Five stages. Data quality, then group sizes, then rates, then contribution, then what it adds up to. Taking them out of order is the standard error in the literature.

The twenty questions

Answered against your own numbers. Questions one to four come first, because checking data quality and group sizes before reading any rate is the whole discipline.

How the flags work

A flag means one of two things only: the arithmetic does not reconcile, or your figure differs from United States 2024 by enough to be worth explaining. There are no published numerical cutoffs for most of these questions, so none have been invented here. A flag is a prompt to investigate, never a verdict on your practice.

Charts

Eight views of your table. Each one answers a specific question, and each downloads as a PNG at twice display resolution.

Summary

A written account of your table, in the order Robson reads one. Edit it freely before it goes into a report or minutes.

Conclusions to test against your own table